Language in its act of perpetual failure, creates atomic signifiers that formulate vast interconnected hurricanes. Language construction spins out centrifigually language constructs while interpretation centripetally maintains the structure whose volume increases proportionally to the capacity for language facilitation.

Nietzsche’s intuitive man devised by Olympian cloudlessness fares in this hurricane jumping from raindrop to raindrop seeing the glisten within each drop, knocked this way and the next aware of the directional force yet marvelling in its mechanics and dynamics. The stoic man can rationalize the structure and work to structurally to determine a route that can lead them to the eye. In the eye the stoic can safely observe the mechanisms system and logic, a glory of dynamics, distanced from the twist and violent forces but only experiencing the formal edges of this storm.

The intuitive draws connections and constructs new interpretants from the associative opportunities of dislocation. These interpretants construct and spray, locking into directionalities, sheeting together into form for the deciphering by the stoic who categorizes the eddy, encapsulating layers to organize and manage this everfolding planet sized storm. Different colors made from the tears in the form.

What is the difference, exactly.

This dimensionality and flexibility in the construct provides the pleasurable sensation of comprehension even as it hints at a incompleteness. Wabi-sabi in effect, the mechanical encrusted on the living, or vice versa, versus the vice of context and language and authorship. This swash lifts both the stoic and the intuitive to participate, the continual unfolding of one lost meaning into the portent of another, a perpetual fall line. Participation is language’s taste of the goods, as it makes the participant both the consumer and producer in a single act that takes all comers. It exists only with participants yet all participants are not equal, the vocabulary, structure, and reference require conformity in order to maximize value to consumers and producers in proportion to their power of distribution.

As the stoic is there a better sheltered vantage point that countermands the experiential of the intuitive, to what end?